futureofagents.org
RESEARCH DOSSIER / 2026.10INITIAL EDITION · OPEN FOR REVIEW
← Back to research index

A plan is a proposal, not proof

Planning & Reasoning.

We evaluate execution traces rather than infer competence from fluent explanations.

EVIDENCE STATUS / LAUNCH

This is a scoped research dossier, not a completed systematic review or an independently tested result. It identifies methods, questions and source trails for future reporting.

01

Long-horizon tasks

Task splitting may help progress but also compounds errors. Each step needs an observable success criterion and recovery path.

02

Checkpoints and budgets

Tool-call ceilings, timeouts and approval gates keep a plan bounded. A model should not be able to expand its own authority mid-run.

03

Evidence of progress

Claims like “completed” should be reconciled with artifacts, tests and external state, not accepted as a self-report.

SUGGESTED VERIFICATION METHOD

What would count as evidence?

Archive the stated plan, actual tool events and independent outcome verification.

STARTING SOURCE TRAIL

Documents to examine

  • OpenAI Agents SDK — Running Agents
  • NIST AI RMF

These are starting points, not claims that every document has been independently reproduced.

Read our cited field note →
EDITORIAL / VERSION RECORD

Edition 1.0 · 09 October 2026

Initial research brief published. No earlier revisions or submitted public corrections are claimed.

Suggest a documented correction ↗